In Science We Trust: Why Faith Alone Can’t Build a Nation

In an age of instant communication and unlimited information access, it is ironic that scientific temper—the ability to think rationally, ask questions, and base opinions on evidence—remains elusive for many. More alarming is the surge in blind belief, pseudo-science, and faith-based decisions, often promoted under the guise of cultural pride or traditional wisdom. In India, where the Constitution itself promotes scientific temper under Article 51A(h), the dream of a rational society is increasingly threatened.

The Rise of Faith Over Facts

From bizarre claims about cow urine curing cancer to applying cow dung as a COVID-19 preventive measure, the mixing of religious belief and public health policy is not just unscientific—it’s dangerous. When such practices are endorsed by political leaders or celebrated on social media without any scientific backing, it fosters a culture where questioning is discouraged, and blind acceptance is the norm.

But India is not alone. Globally, we’ve seen vaccine hesitancy spurred by religious groups in the US, climate change denial driven by ideology in parts of Europe, and pseudoscience promoted by wellness influencers worldwide. The problem lies not just in belief systems, but in the decline of critical thinking and the increasing personalization of "truth."

What Is Scientific Temper?

Scientific temper is not about rejecting faith—it’s about applying reasoning. As defined by Jawaharlal Nehru, it involves a spirit of inquiry and objectivity, a willingness to accept facts, and a readiness to change in light of new evidence. It means questioning claims, testing them, and not accepting something merely because it is said by someone in authority or tradition.

In today’s polarized world, where religious sentiments often override logic, scientific temper is essential—not to replace belief, but to keep belief from becoming dogma.

Have We Made Scientific Progress?

Yes, India has made tremendous strides in multiple domains. We’ve launched missions to Mars (Mangalyaan, 2013) and the Moon (Chandrayaan), built a powerful digital payments infrastructure (UPI), and developed indigenous vaccines like Covaxin. Our space agency ISRO is admired globally, and Indian scientists are part of path-breaking international research in fields ranging from biotechnology to quantum computing.

Yet, if we look at the broader picture, questions remain: Have we created a globally competitive product or innovation that changed the world in the last 50 years? Maybe a few, but certainly not enough for a nation of 1.4 billion people. The success stories often stand on the shoulders of a few institutions—like IISc, IITs, and ISRO—while the majority of the country lacks quality education, research infrastructure, or a culture of scientific curiosity.

Science and Faith: Can They Coexist?

Yes, and they must. Faith gives people hope, a sense of identity, and community. Science gives them tools to survive and thrive. The problem arises when faith is misused to bypass science, reject evidence, or suppress questioning. The aim is not to eradicate faith, but to ensure it doesn't replace scientific reasoning in policy, education, or healthcare.

Lessons from Ancient and Modern India

India has a rich tradition of scientific inquiry—Aryabhata’s astronomy, Sushruta’s surgical techniques, and ancient contributions to mathematics and metallurgy. But modern India often invokes these achievements not as a foundation for inquiry but as trophies of past glory. We need to stop glorifying the past while neglecting present-day science education and critical thinking.

What have we discovered recently that adds to this legacy?

• 2023: ISRO launched Aditya-L1, India’s first mission to study the Sun.

• 2021: The Indian scientist-led team contributed to the world's first DNA-based COVID vaccine (ZyCoV-D).

• Ongoing: Indian startups are exploring AI, renewable energy, and agri-tech, but often with foreign funding and mentorship.

Why Scientific Temper Is More Urgent Than Ever to Build a Nation

In today’s world of AI, genetic engineering, and space exploration, our survival and progress depend not on what we believe, but on what we understand. Imagine being in a road accident—you'd want a trained doctor, not a priest, to treat your injuries. When your phone stops working, you call an engineer, not a spiritual guru. Every modern convenience we rely on—from electricity to medicines to the internet—is the result of scientific thinking, experimentation, and education.

A society that values curiosity, encourages questioning, and builds its systems on evidence and reason will continue to innovate and thrive. But a society that silences questions, labels critical thinking as “anti-national,” or replaces professionals with faith-based solutions risks falling behind. In an age where facts can be verified instantly, clinging blindly to belief without reason is not just outdated—it’s dangerous.

There are some clear and relatable examples where logic and faith both serve different but valuable purposes—and why mixing them can lead to confusion or harm:

🔬

1. Health & Medicine

• Faith: A person may pray for strength during an illness or visit a temple, church, or dargah to seek peace.

• Logic: The same person must still take prescribed antibiotics, vaccines, or undergo surgery if needed.

• Why separation matters: Replacing medical treatment with rituals alone can delay recovery or even cost lives. Faith may help emotionally, but science heals biologically.

2. Natural Disasters

• Faith: People might believe a higher power saved them during a natural calamity.

• Logic: Earthquakes and floods occur due to geological or climatic conditions, and preparedness (like building codes or early warning systems) is key to survival.

• Why separation matters: If we see disasters only as divine punishment, we miss learning from science to prevent or reduce damage in the future.

3. Education

• Faith: Moral values taught through religion—compassion, truth, humility—shape a child's character.

• Logic: Curriculum must be based on proven facts—mathematics, physics, biology—built through centuries of evidence-based learning.

• Why separation matters: Introducing unscientific or mythological content in science classes misleads students and dilutes intellectual development.

4. Law and Justice

• Faith: One may believe in karma or divine justice.

• Logic: The legal system must rely on evidence, facts, and due process.

• Why separation matters: If justice is left to belief alone, it can lead to mob lynching, superstition-based trials, or bias.

5. Mental Health

• Faith: Prayer or spiritual guidance can offer comfort in tough times.

• Logic: Depression, anxiety, or trauma require counseling, therapy, or medical support.

• Why separation matters: Believing that mental illness is caused by "evil spirits" instead of brain chemistry delays treatment and stigmatizes sufferers.

6. Scientific Innovation

• Faith: Visionaries may be driven by hope or belief in a better future.

• Logic: Turning that vision into reality requires experiments, testing, and iteration.

• Why separation matters: Innovation doesn't happen by wishful thinking—it needs structured, rational inquiry.

Conclusion

Scientific temper is not a Western imposition—it is a constitutional duty, a cultural necessity, and a survival strategy in the modern world. Faith may offer comfort, but science saves lives. The dream of a scientifically-minded India is still far from reality, but if we nurture inquiry over ideology, and reason over rhetoric, we can make it a part of our national identity—not just a constitutional footnote.